• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AXIUM 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AXIUM 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number QC-2-2-3D
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/29/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during the treatment of a ruptured saccular aneurysm in the internal carotid artery, a coil-related issue occurred with the axium helix coil and axium 3d coil, where the coil became stuck in the sheath three times.The aneurysm had a maximum diameter of 5 millimeters and a neck diameter of 2 millimeters, with moderate vessel tortuosity and normal blood flow.The devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use.The issue involved coil resistance and the coil being stuck in the sheath.The resolution or outcome of the event was not specified.Additional information received reported the coil accidentally broke during the procedure, and no detachment attempts had been made.There was no kink/damage observed on the pushwire.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3.Product analysis: equipment used: vis (m-78210), 203cm ruler (m-83361), pin gauge sets (m-84082, m-84080) as found condition (condition of returned device): 3 axium implant coils were returned for analysis within a shipping box; within their opened axium implant coil outer cartons and within their opened axium implant coil inner pouches.Visual inspection/damage location details: the axium implant coil was returned within introducer sheath.No bends or kinks were found with the axium implant coil pushwire.The axium implant coil was found to be stretched and damaged within introducer she ath.The axium implant coil was unable to be pushed out from introducer sheath for further analysis as it was found to be stuck.No other anomalies were observed.Testing/analysis (including sem reports): the axium implant coil tip od (outer diameter) was measured to be 0.0111¿ which is within specifications.The id (inner diameter) of the introducer sheath was measured to be 0.0185¿ which is within specifications.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and the reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck in sheath¿ was confirmed; however, the root cause was unable to be determined.The customer reported preparing the axium implant coil as indicated in the ifu prior to use.It is possible insufficient preparation of the axium implant coil, damage during preparation or improper hubbing technique (over tightening of the rhv) could have contributed to the event.Based on the analysis performed, the customers report of ¿coil separation/break¿ was unable to be confirmed as the pushwires were returned with the implant coil still attached.H6.Coding updated based on analysis findings.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM 3D
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635265677
MDR Report Key21064000
Report Number9617601-2025-00011
Device Sequence Number16996448
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536037618
UDI-Public00847536037618
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryVM
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/03/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberQC-2-2-3D
Device Catalogue NumberQC-2-2-3D
Device Lot Number228436962
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/09/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/06/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/02/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/03/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/16/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-