|
It was reported that the user found the 'cook bakri postpartum balloon with rapid instillation components' was broken during removal in the intensive care unit.As reported, the fluid removal was started but an exit was not achieved.Upon complete removal and inspection of the balloon, it was found that the device was broken.As reported, the device was inside the uterine cavity for 24 hours.After this time, the balloon was removed because no saline solution came out.The device had performed hemostasis effectively, as no residual bleeding was reported in the patient afterward.As reported, the patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Investigation ¿ evaluation: it was reported that the user found the 'cook bakri postpartum balloon with rapid instillation components' was broken during removal in the intensive care unit.As reported, the fluid removal was started but an exit was not achieved.Upon complete removal and inspection of the balloon, it was found that the device was broken.As reported, the device was inside the uterine cavity for 24 hours.After this time, the balloon was removed because no saline solution came out.The device had performed hemostasis effectively, as no residual bleeding was reported in the patient afterward.As reported, the patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control (qc) procedures were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no functional testing or visual inspections could be performed.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no related non-conformances that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.A complaint history database search showed no other related complaints associated with the failure mode for the complaint device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling; the ifu supplied with the device states the following in consideration of the reported failure mode: how supplied "upon removal from the package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." based upon the available information, no product returned, and results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the cause for the complaint could not be established.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|