• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU600
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 10/25/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section h3- no: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient had a hyperopic surprise, specifically a +1.50 spherical equivalent in the left eye, one week after intraocular lens (iol) implantation.The patient then was scheduled for an explant on (b)(6) 2024.Explant was done as scheduled, the doctor used iris hooks and sutures, no vitrectomy.It was noted that the patient has a preexisting condition of floppy iris syndrome, hence the iris hooks were used.Replacement iol was same model but 3.5d power size higher as the original iol.It was unknown if replacement iol helped address the visual issues of the patient.Nevertheless, there was no injury, and surgery was completed successfully.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: feb 3, 2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was received cut in half and the cut included one of the haptics.The lens pieces were cleaned and presented with no further issues.No further evaluation was performed.No issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues reported were identified during product evaluation.The ¿lens cut¿ observed during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21072400
Report Number3012236936-2024-000334
Device Sequence Number18235685
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474750111
UDI-Public(01)05050474750111(17)241117
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/18/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/17/2024
Device Model NumberDIU600
Device Catalogue NumberDIU600U215
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/10/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/07/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/03/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/18/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/17/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-