| Model Number |
ONYXNG25015UX |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Deformation (2976); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Vascular Dissection (3160); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
01/02/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a procedure involving a onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stent to address an 85% lesion stenosis in a mildly tortuous and calcified lesion in the mid-right coronary artery (rca), stent deformation occurred in vivo during positioning and advancement.An attempt to cross the onyx frontier stent through a non-medtronic stent failed and the stent was removed.Upon inspection the stent had struts that were pulled up and a dissection was observed.The device was inspected with no issues noted.Negative prep was not performed.The lesion was pre-dilated using a non-medtronic 2.0 x 12mm balloon.The stent did pass through a previously deployed stent and resistance was encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used.A 6f launcher guide catheter and a non-medtronic guidewire were used when attempting to deliver the 2.5 x15 onyx frontier stent distal to the existing stent and when the stent failed to cross the lesion the existing guide catheter was removed.A new 6f launcher guide catheter was introduced, along with a telescope guide extension catheter.An attempt to pass another 2.0 x 15mm onyx frontier stent was made but was unable to cross the lesion.The decision was made to balloon the area using multiple balloon catheters, including a sprinter 2.0 x 12 otw and euphora balloons (2.0 x 25 and 2.5 x 25) to complete the procedure.The patient was reported to be alive with no further injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: it is believed that the onyx frontier stent must have been roughed up by the existing non-medtronic stent struts sticking out in the vessel.It is not believed that the onyx frontier stent or 6f launcher guide catheter caused or contributed to the dissection.A new 6f launcher guide catheter was introduced, along with a telescope guide extension catheter with no issues noted.The decision was made to balloon the area and treat the dissection using multiple balloon catheters, including a sprinter 2.0 x 12 otw and euphora balloons (2.0 x 25 and 2.5 x 25) to complete the procedure.Both devices were inspected prior to use with no issues noted.Negative prep was not performed on either stent.The lesion was pre-dilated using a non-medtronic 2.0 x 12mm balloon.Both stents did pass through a previously deployed stent and resistance was encountered when advancing the devices.Excessive force was not used.The patient was reported to be alive and doing well with no further injury.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product analysis: the device was returned for evaluation.The stent was positioned on the balloon between the marker bands as per position specification, but due to proximal stent deformation the stent did not meet visual acceptance specification.Deformation was evident to the proximal stent wraps with struts raised.Deformation was evident to the distal tip.The inner lumen patency was verified with a mandrel.Kinks were evident to the hypotube.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Additional information: annex d code.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|