• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS OXIMETRY CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS OXIMETRY CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number X3820SJD
Medical Device Problem Code Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion (2182)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been requested for return for a product evaluation.It has not arrived.Once the product evaluation has been completed a supplemental report will be submitted with the findings.The lot number is unknown.Therefore, the device history record review cannot be completed.Additional product codes, dre and dqe.Additional 510k number k110167.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that there was a malfunction with the oximetry central venous catheter, during use.There was leakage from the optical module connector of the catheter.This resulted in medication loss of potassium.There was no patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned and a product evaluation was performed.The findings found that the report of leakage was confirmed.There was blood visible at the optical module connector.The leakage was detected between the distal lumen and the optical fiber lumen inside the backform.There was no leakage or occlusion observed in the proximal and medial lumens.A visual inspection found no other damage or inconsistency from the catheter, including at the tip.The backform was cut down and a gap was observed inside the backform between the distal lumen and optical fiber lumen.An engineering evaluation was initiated to assess for any manufacturing related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.Corrective action was generated to investigate leakage in the backform.There are process controls in place to detect the reported condition.100 percent tests are in place to identify the defect before the product is distributed.Based on the product investigation there is no evidence that the failure is related to a manufacturing defect.All devices passed their associated testing before distribution.A fundamental root cause was not able to be determined.Opportunities of process enhancement were identified to strengthen the manufacturing process.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS OXIMETRY CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
Common Device Name
EDWARDS OXIMETRY CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES PR
state rd indus pk km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan diaz
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492507258
MDR Report Key21096653
Report Number2015691-2025-00123
Device Sequence Number8775842
Product Code DXG
UDI-Device Identifier00690103197587
UDI-Public(01)00690103197587
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K053609
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/01/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberX3820SJD
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/26/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/31/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/07/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/01/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-