|
|
| Catalog Number |
TSVMWH10 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Separation Failure (2547)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/16/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the mount would not disengage from the implant, therefore the implant had to be removed.The procedure was completed with another implant.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).A2: age and date of birth unknown / not provided.A4: weight unknown / not provided.G4: additional pma/510(k) number ¿ k133339.Customer has indicated that the product is in process of being returned to zimvie for investigation.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.D9: device availability and return date were updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation codes were added: 4109, 4111 and 3331.H6: investigation findings code was added: 180.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 4307.H10: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie received the reported implant for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the as returned device identified the implant and bundle mount with signs of use, apparent dried blood / tissue attached to exterior surfaces.The implant was engaged to the bundle mount and did not disengage/release as intended from the mount during a functional test.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and one (1) other complaint was identified.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation is incorrect techniques used during implant placement customer error.Therefore, based on the available information, and functional testing, device malfunction did occur.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional event information received at the time of this report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|