|
This medwatch report is being filed based on the results of the product received for evaluation on (b)(6) 2024, which presented a ductile, tensile overload fracture of the core wire.As received, the specimen consisted of one-1 each pkg-safari2 275cm x sml crv 5p; returned coiled and loose without the j-straightener and dispenser assembly and double-bagged within "zip-lock" style poly biohazard pouches.A review of the device history records of the specimen device does not present any indication of manufacturing defect or anomaly that could have impacted on the event as reported.During manufacturing and packaging of this product the operators are instructed to 100% visually inspect for any obvious defect prior to shipment.The history records indicate this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.The specimen presented a ductile, tensile overload fracture of the core wire at 0.1 cm from the distal tip weld mass with approximately 150 cm of concurrent stretched coil damage beginning at the distal tip.The specimen also presented kink damage at 163.5cm, 164.5cm and 170cm from the distal aspect of the formed curve.There was no mention of the ductile, tensile overload fracture of the core wire material in the event description; therefore, the exact timing cannot be confirmed.Our investigation was unable to confirm that the product did not meet specification prior to shipment.The investigation concluded that the product met specification at the time of shipment.As indicated in the dfu, operational instructions, preparation for use: ·inspect and prepare the catheter according to the manufacturer's instructions.This includes flushing the catheter to be used with heparinized saline solution.·verify compatibility of interacting devices prior to use.As indicated in the device instructions for use warnings: ·exercise care in handling of the guidewire during a procedure to reduce the possibility of accidental breakage, bending, kinking or coil separation.Resulting guidewire fractures might require additional percutaneous intervention or surgery.·never advance the guidewire against the resistance without first determining the reason for resistance under fluoroscopy.Excessive force against resistance may result in damage to the catheter or vessel/organ.Care should be taken when advancing a guidewire after device deployment.·the wire should only be introduced into or withdrawn from the ventricle through a catheter already positioned in the ventricle.·the curve of the safari2¿ guidewire should be constrained within a catheter during insertion into or withdrawal from the body or treatment site.At this time, it is not possible to assign a definitive root cause for the event as reported.Based on the information provided, it appears that procedural and/or handling factors have contributed to the event as reported.The patient informaiton was requested and not provided.Should additional information be received, a follow up medwatch report will be submitted.Note: although annex g instructions state that with stand-alone devices annex g term should not be used, code 4755 was selected due to component code (g) showing up on the missing data report.
|
|
Event description: on removing the safari wire at the completion of the procedure it was noticed that the coil of the wire had delaminated from the core wire.No complications for the patient and case completed successfully.The doctor quoted that they had been putting a lot of shearing force back and forth along the wire when trying to deploy the medtronic valve multiple times.What troubleshooting steps, if any, resolved the issue?: na.What is the next course of action?: none needed- the procedure was completed using the original device.Patient present at time of event?: yes.Patient complications: no patient complications.Was issue present upon opening package?: no.Photo or video of issue: no.Question: is it known what caused the device damage? answer: unknown but hinting towards the force of the device tip on the wire question: what were possible contributing factors (comorbidities, anatomy characteristics, etc)? answer: unknown.Question: when specifically during device prep or during the procedure did the device damage occur? answer: at the end of the procedure when removing the wire from the catheter question: where specifically on the device did the damage occur? answer: the tip.Information received on 21nov2024: question: can bsc confirm with the end user/ hospital what is meant by "the coil of the wire had delaminated from the core wire"? is the coil material fractured or is the coil material stretched, not fractured? answered: rep confirmed the coil material was stretched but not fractured.
|