• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON ACRYSOF IQ ASPHERIC UV ABSORBING IOLWITH ULTRASERT DELIVERY SYSTEM; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON ACRYSOF IQ ASPHERIC UV ABSORBING IOLWITH ULTRASERT DELIVERY SYSTEM; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ACU0T0
Medical Device Problem Code Defective Component (2292)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/16/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
A healthcare professional reported during an intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, the intraocular lens trailing haptic was stuck in the injector, and lens was removed during initial procedure.The procedure was completed with the another lens.There was no patient harm.No further information expected as reporter unwilling to provide additional information.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A product was not returned for analysis.Complaint history and product history records were reviewed, and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Root cause has not been identified.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was provided in d.9., h.3., h.6.And h.11.The device and the lens were returned inside the carton.The plunger was oriented correctly.The lens stop and plunger lock were removed.Viscoelastic was observed in the device.The plunger was fully advanced with the plunger tip extended beyond the device.A broken haptic was observed.The haptic was on top of the plunger in the nozzle tip.The remainder of the lens was returned on a piece of paper.Viscoelastic was observed on the lens.One haptic was broken in the distal area (returned inside the device).The optic edge was torn from the edge to the optic center.Product history records were reviewed and the documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Viscoelastic was not provided.It is unknown if the qualified product was used.The root cause for the reported complaint could not be determined.The broken haptic was on top of the plunger.The trailing haptic position may indicate it was not in a proper position for advancement per the provided diagrams in the ifu.The ifu instructs after the lens has been advanced to the fill to line, the lens should be visually inspected to determine the position of the haptics.The plunger should be in contact with the trailing optic edge.No part of the lens should exit the nozzle prior to insertion through the incision.Once the lens is in position at the fill to line, it should be implanted within 3 minutes.Proceeding with implantation of a misfolded haptic or a lens that appears to be out of position can result in a broken haptic or other negative outcome, since the haptic may be trapped and stretched, and/or pinched and sheared by the moving plunger.It is unknown if a qualified viscoelastic was used.The ifu instructs during device preparation and implantation of the company model iol with the company preloaded delivery system, a company qualified ophthalmic viscoelastic device (ovd) should be used.The use of an unqualified ovd may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the device preparation and implantation steps.Broken haptics may occur: due to the use of a non-qualified viscoelastic.The use of an unqualified ovd may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the device preparation and implantation steps.If the operating room temperature is too high (morethan 23degreec / 73degree f) lens folding consistency is negatively affected, the lens is more adherent and this may inhibit lens advancement.In addition, haptic strength (modulus) decreases as the temperature increases and is more likely to break under stress.If a straight trailing haptic occurs and it was not properly detected to be out of position.If the plunger is not fully advanced, or if the plunger is allowed to retract, the trailing haptic may not release properly from the device.Any of the above listed causes alone, or in combination, may create the reported event.Information was provided that indicated the customer did not wish to be contacted.File will be reopened if new information is received.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACRYSOF IQ ASPHERIC UV ABSORBING IOLWITH ULTRASERT DELIVERY SYSTEM
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON
6065 kyle lane
huntington WV 25702
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HUNTINGTON
246 kyle lane
huntington WV 25702
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key21123145
Report Number1119421-2025-00129
Device Sequence Number7679242
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier00380652395373
UDI-Public(01)00380652395373(17)261111(11)231113(10)15752771
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryDA
PMA/510(K) Number
P930014
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/28/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberACU0T0
Device Lot Number15752771
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/18/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/03/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/10/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/28/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/13/2023
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-