| Model Number |
VICM5_12.6 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Blurred Vision (2137)
|
| Date of Event |
08/21/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: h3 - type of investigation code: 10- device evaluation: the lens was returned in a microcentrifuge vial with moisture.Visual inspection found no visible damage.Dimensional inspection found the lens to be within specifications.Functional inspection found the returned lens did not meet original values measured at the time of manufacturing.Claim# (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6 investigation type code: 4110 lens work order search no similar complaint event(s) within associated lots were found.H11- manufacturer narrative: secondary surgical intervention to remove/replace/reposition the lens is identified in the labeling as a known potential adverse event following icl implantation.Each lens is subjected to a 100% assessment of the power (spherical and cylinder) and optical resolution during the manufacturing process in order to determine acceptability per the lens model and diopter.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A facility representative reported that following an implantable collamer lens (icl) implantation procedure, the patient experienced a refractive surprise.In a separate visit the lens was exchanged for the same model, different power lens and the problem was resolved.The cause of the event was reported as unknown.It has been noted that the surgeon selected a different lens size than that initially suggested by the icl calculation software.Therefore, there is not enough safety and effectiveness data to support implantation in this patient category.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: h6- type of investigation code: 3331- device history record (dhr) review: based on the results of the investigation, all released devices from the associated work order(s), including the suspected device, have been manufactured within established process parameters; and there is no indication that the manufacturing and processing of the device contributed to the complaint issue.Claim# (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|