|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: investigation summary the product has not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics, however photos were provided for review.¿ the photo investigation revealed that milagro intscr 8x23mm *ea had the anchor broken at the distal end, the anchor appeared to have foreign matter, presumably biological matter.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the milagro intscr 8x23mm *ea would contribute to the complained device issue.¿ a review of the batch manufacturing records was conducted on finished lot number 220l396: and no related non-conformances were identified.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to a procedural variable, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; resistance may have been felt when the device was being inserted and the excessive force applied caused the anchor to break.As per ifu, if resistance is felt during the insertion of a milagro interference screw over a guidewire, stop and confirm that the guidewire is not entrapped.If entrapped, back out the screw and withdraw the guidewire, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
|
It was reported that during an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure, it was observed that the device broke off, then all the broken parts were removed.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There was patient involvement.There were no adverse consequences to the patient nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|