• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS, INC SMART PORT CT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIODYNAMICS, INC SMART PORT CT; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number CT96STSD
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Unspecified Infection (1930)
Date of Event 06/03/2010
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device is not available to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.An investigation into the root cause for the event is currently in progress.The results of the investigation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.Reference (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
On or about (b)(6) 2010, (b)(6) underwent placement of an angiodynamics' smartport ct product, catalog number ct96stsd.Upon information and belief, the device's description is as follows: smart port ct single titanium port system with attachable 9.6f x 66cm silicone catheter.Upon information and belief, the device at issue was implanted by dr.(b)(6), md., at (b)(6) hospital, in (b)(6), for long-term venous access for plaintiff's medical condition.On or about (b)(6) 2010, plaintiff's port-a-cath at issue was scheduled for removal.On or about (b)(6) 2010, dr.(b)(6), m.D.Removed plaintiff's port-a-cath at issue, as the pre-op diagnosis indicated that plaintiff's port-a-cath became infected while being implanted.Upon information and belief, the removal procedure in question took place at (b)(6) hospital, in (b)(6).Upon the removal of plaintiff's port-a-cath, it was determined that plaintiff's porta- cath at issue was indeed infected.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The customer's reported complaint description of patient infection cannot be confirmed given the patient centric nature of this serious adverse event (sae).No port device was returned for evaluation since there was no report of port device malfunction, damage or performance issue during use.A device history record (dhr) review could not be performed since there was no reported lot number.The port was implanted into the patient 31 days prior to the patient's infection.There was no report of port device malfunction or performance issue during use.If the manufacturing/packaging/sterilization of the port device in question was to contribute to an infection in the patient it would have likely occurred shortly after the implant date and not 31 days later.Device direction for use cautions that each access of the port should be performed using aseptic technique, following the institutions universal precautions.In addition, the port implant procedure itself may have contributed to the infection.There is no indication from the reported complaint that the manufacturing/packaging/sterilization of the port device could have contributed to the patient's infection.Infection is cautioned in the device dfu as a potential complication of port system use.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) that is provided in the smartport device contains the following directions and precautions: contraindications: · catheter insertion in the subclavian vein medial to the border of the first rib, an area which is associated with higher rates for pinch-off.Warnings: · the device is to be implanted, used, maintained, and removed in strict accordance with institutional and or centers for disease control (cdc) guidelines or policies.· reuse of single-use devices creates a potential risk of patient or user infections.Contamination of the device may lead to injury, illness or death of the patient.· do not use syringes smaller than 10 ml syringe when accessing the port as system damage can occur.Flushing occluded catheters with small syringes can create excessive pressures within the port system.Absence of a blood return or a poor blood return can be a sign of a potential complication such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, fibrin formation, thrombosis or malposition.This should be evaluated prior to device usage.· a blood return should be present prior to usage of device for any therapy or testing.· do not attempt to measure the patient's blood pressure on the arm in which a peripheral system is located, since catheter occlusion or other damage to the catheter could occur.· if the patient complains of pain, or there is swelling when the device is flushed or when medication or contrast media is administered, evaluate the device for infiltration, proper needle placement, and potential complications such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, thrombosis or malposition.Failure to assess these complaints or observations can lead to device failure.Precautions: · carefully read and follow all instructions prior to use.· strict aseptic technique is of paramount importance when implanting any device.Potential complications: use of an angiodynamics port system involves potential risks normally associated with the insertion or use of any implanted device or indwelling catheter including but not limited to: erosion of vessel and skin.Implant rejection.Infection.Necrosis of scarring of skin over implant area.Vessel trauma.Post-operative care: the incision site should be monitored for signs of infection, inflammation, hematoma, device rotation or erosion.Routine wound care should be given to these sites.The smart port ct implantable port may be used immediately after verification of catheter placement.Instruct patient to avoid any heavy exertion or strenuous activity during the first few days after surgery.General guidelines: · each access of an angiodynamics smart port ct implantable port should be performed using aseptic technique.· follow institutional universal precautions.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Reference (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SMART PORT CT
Common Device Name
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer Contact
alexandra invencio
26 forest street
marlborough, MA 01752
5086587990
MDR Report Key21150456
Report Number1317056-2024-00311
Device Sequence Number15732789
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device IdentifierH787CT96STSD0
UDI-PublicH787CT96STSD0
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateKY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K062414
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2010
Device Explanted Year2010
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/06/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberCT96STSD
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/20/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/04/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/14/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/06/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Other; Hospitalization;
Patient SexMale
-
-