|
Updated fields: d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h11.Duraseal dural sealant system (202050) was not returned for evaluation; therefore, an evaluation of the device could not be performed.Lot number information has been provided; therefore, device history record (dhr) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found.The root cause is undetermined.Per the dfmea, potential causes of failure include: issues with performance.The risk remains acceptable per the risk analysis.If additional relevant information becomes available in the future, this complaint will be reopened, and the respective evaluation performed.Trends will be monitored for this and similar issues.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|
|
Updated fields: d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h11.The duraseal exact spine sealant system 5 ml us box of 5 (206520) was returned for evaluation: device history record (dhr) review ¿ a dhr review and trending were performed as part of the evaluation.At the time of manufacturing, records from each manufacturing lot are thoroughly reviewed to ensure that products are released meeting all quality release specifications, and proper finished good testing was performed prior to release as indicated in the dhr.Failure analysis: the investigation was re-opened to include sample evaluation.Sample received back included two polymer kits in their original open pouch/tray inside of a plastic bag.The polymer kit 1 included 2 syringes (borate/phosphate), 1 holder, 1 y-connector, 3 loose spray tips, and 1 vial.Polymer kit 2 included 2 syringes (borate/phosphate), 2 holders, 1 y-connector, 3 loose spray tips, and 1 vial.For both polymer kits, the loose spray tips, holders and y-connectors were visually inspected and none of the components showed signs of damage or usage.For polymer kit 1, the clear syringe was visually inspected, no damages were detected, and it was received completely empty.The blue syringe was visually inspected, and it was received empty and attached to the bioset.No damage was detected, and traces of blue solution were observed on the tip.The vial was observed with the spike fully depressed, and the redline was not visible.The vial had blue solution inside.For polymer kit 2, the clear syringe was visually inspected, no signs of damages were detected, and it was full of solution (2.5 ml).The blue syringe was visually inspected; it was received empty and attached to the bioset.No damage was observed and the tip had traces of blue solution.The vial had the spike fully depressed and the redline was not visible.The vial had blue solution inside, and it was observed to be still fluid and with traces on top of the bioset.For both polymer kits, water was placed into their respective blue syringes and then connected to the bioset to withdraw the solution.The solution was able to be injected into the vial and returned to the syringe without any leaks.Per the sample evaluation, the solution in both samples were able to be injected into the vial and returned to the syringe.The samples worked as expected with no issues or leaks present.Therefore, the failure mode was not confirmed.Root cause: the root cause is undetermined, and the complaint was unable to be confirmed.Proper finished good testing was performed prior to release as indicated in the dhr.Product received was tested and no issues were found nor could the complaint be replicated.Per the fmea, potential causes of failure include: issues with performance.The risk remains acceptable per the risk analysis.Trends will be monitored for this and similar issues.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|