|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 component code: g07002 device not returned.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no related non-conformances were identified.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Did the bloody exudate consist of active bleeding? please explain.When did the bleeding occur? what was the source and triggering event of bleeding? what was the volume of blood loss? how was the bleeding treated? please provide the patient's weight, bmi at the time of index procedure.Confirm that the initial procedure was surgical treatment for fracture of the right tibial plateau.If no, explain.Confirm that ¿necrotic tissue excision and debridement surgery¿ occurred post op.If no, explain.On what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? when beginning the running suture, did the surgeon take the first pass above or adjacent to the incision in a direction away from the incision? after taking the first pass away from the incision, did the surgeon then take a pass of tissue perpendicular to the initial pass? if so, how many perpendicular passes? did the surgeon then proceed with wound closure in the opposite direction of the first pass? was the fixation tab seated against the tissue at the initiation of suture use during the index procedure? were two reverse stitches performed across the incision prior to closure? did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? can you describe the appearance of the stratafix suture during second procedure, if applicable? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status?.
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent treatment for a fracture of the right tibial plateau on (b)(6)2024 and barbed suture was used.The patient was discharged smoothly.On the 9th day after surgery, the patient was readmitted due to poor wound healing.On the 17th day after surgery, a necrotic tissue resection and debridement were performed, and the bloody exudate was reduced.The wound was not sutured and the patient was discharged.Additional information was requested.
|
|
Product complaint #(b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Corrected information: b3.
|