|
It was reported that while preparing to perform an ablation procedure, an alert advised to disconnect the vapor probe from the cartridge to allow the self test to proceed.The green light was not on inside the syringe, they reinserted several times and it did not illuminate.They disconnected and reconnected cartridge and got the same alert.The unit was powered off and went through the steps again.This time the green was on inside the syringe on top of console.They made it to the screen to begin probe self test and received alert: 564 hardware error.It could not be cleared.Patient was already under general anesthesia and no ablation could be done.No additional information is available.(b)(4).
|
|
Updated: b4, d9, g3, g6, h1, h2, h3, h4, h6, h7, h11.Distribution history: unit was purchased 04-apr-2023, manufactured under d103670, updated 01-oct-2024 under production rework order (b)(4) and sold 10/16/2024.Manufacturing record review: the gen-16-050 product line is not currently online.Units sold were acquired for finished goods items now sold from csi's distribution center.The dhr provided did not reveal anomalies.Service history record: no additional service history records found for this unit.Historical complaint review: a review of the 2-year complaint history showed similar reported complaint condition.Complaints mentioning use of anesthesia were not confirmed.Complaints noting code 564 were not confirmed either.Product receipt: this unit was received at csi on 1/16/2025.Visual evaluation: visual examination of the complaint unit revealed no physical damage.Functional evaluation: complaint unit was functionally evaluated and found to function properly.Service history record: no additional service history records found for this unit.Root cause: as the unit functioned free of defects a root cause is not applicable.The warning error was not duplicated.Based on the problem description, the issue is being attributed to user error.If the customer had not locked in the syringe, it is possible to have caused their unit to fault.Similarly, if they already had the probe connected the self-test would not function correctly.There is a self-test without a probe and another when the probe is connected.Although the error code was not produced at csi it is possible a combination or errors was a factor in producing the error code by the end user.The unit was evaluated and found to function free of defects three times.Two with service and repair and one more with engineering.A new unit was provided to the customer when the rma was created for this unit.Coopersurgical will continue to monitor this complaint condition for trends.No further corrective action is necessary, as the complaint condition was not confirmed.
|