|
Additional information was provided in d.9., h.3., h.6.And h.11.The product was returned for analysis and the reported complaint was observed.The device was returned loose in the product carton.The lock-out assembly has been removed.Viscoelastic is observed in the device.The plunger has been advanced outside of the device and is advanced under the intra ocular lens (iol).The iol is advanced to just past the lens bay and is damaged, one haptic is broken torn and located at the depth guard.We are unable to determine the root cause for the reported complaint "the lens was failed to come out from injector".Plunger underride was observed.Plunger underride may occur: ¿ if the lens has become misaligned in the lens bay during the manufacturing process.¿ due to the use of a non-qualified viscoelastic.Material properties of non-qualified ophthalmic viscosurgical device (ovd)s may contribute to underfill, overfill, misfolding of the haptics, or other inconsistent folding outcomes.¿ if inadequate viscoelastic is placed in the device this will cause inadequate coverage of the lens fold path which may cause the lens to advance incorrectly or become ¿stuck¿ in the device allowing the plunger to underride the lens.¿ if the operating room temperature is too high (greater 23 degree celsius / 73 degree fahrenheit) lens folding consistency is negatively affected, the lens is more adherent and this may inhibit lens advancement.Any of the above listed causes alone, or in combination, may create the reported event.Based on the results from the product history record, the products met release criteria.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|