• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/16/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2,a3, a4 and a5: unknown/ not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) had a damaged leading haptic.During the procedure, there was patient contact with the iol, which was subsequently replaced with an iol of the same model and diopter.Additional information indicates that the leading haptic was damaged upon insertion, but the lens was not implanted.There was no injury or further intervention required.No additional information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d-9: device date returned to manufacturer: march 2025.Section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was stuck in the cartridge with a portion of the lens sticking out of the cartridge tip.The lens was observed to be damaged with a detached and missing haptic.Viscoelastic residue was observed to be distributed throughout the cartridge, no damage to the cartridge was observed.The lens module was opened and inspected and ovd was observed inside, indicating that an excessive amount of ovd may have been used which may have contributed to the complaint issue reported.The handpiece and plunger rod were inspected, and no issues were observed.No further issues were identified and no further evaluation was performed.The complaint issue was not identified during product evaluation.The observed is similar to the reported complaint issue.However, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.The complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21209638
Report Number3012236936-2025-000013
Device Sequence Number19819095
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731646
UDI-Public(01)05050474731646(17)270709
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/22/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0145
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/30/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/29/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/22/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/22/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/09/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-