• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. WORKMATE¿ CLARIS¿ AMPLIFIER; COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. WORKMATE¿ CLARIS¿ AMPLIFIER; COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number H700150
Medical Device Problem Code Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/08/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
During the procedure preparation for a pvi with the patient prepped, it was noted that there was no connection between the amplifier and the dws.The amplifier, dws, stimulator, and ep4 touchscreen were restarted several times in the correct sequence which would resolve the issue briefly.There were no replacement cables available to try replacing.In addition, the cables from the amplifier were pulled through the ceiling into another room to the dws.To resolve the issue, the system had to be restarted multiple times until it worked.The procedure was completed successfully without adverse consequences.Later testing by a technician revealed that the amplifier caused the issue.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, g3, h2, h3, h6.The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be determined.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed.No non-conformances associated with the reported event were identified.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5, d9, g3, h2, h3, h6 one claris¿ amplifier 120 channel sn: (b)(6) was received for evaluation.The reported event was able to be duplicated by inspection of the amplifier logs.Based on the investigation and information provided to abbott, the reported event was able to be confirmed, and the root cause was attributed to the sbc (single board computer) and the cmos battery.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed.No non-conformances associated with the reported event were identified.
 
Event or Problem Description
The device was received.Follow up report needed to address updated analysis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WORKMATE¿ CLARIS¿ AMPLIFIER
Common Device Name
COMPUTER, DIAGNOSTIC, PROGRAMMABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
one st. jude medical drive
st. paul MN 55117
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
one st. jude medical drive
st. paul MN 55117
Manufacturer Contact
wendy mccarty
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key21220158
Report Number2184149-2025-00021
Device Sequence Number21031604
Product Code DQK
UDI-Device Identifier05415067001504
UDI-Public(01)05415067001504(10)5995844
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K210392
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberH700150
Device Catalogue NumberH700150
Device Lot Number5995844
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/08/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/02/2025
07/16/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/23/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/15/2025
07/16/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/08/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-