• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN 980 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN 980 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 980X1ESDIEC
Medical Device Problem Codes Improper Flow or Infusion (2954); Output Problem (3005)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/15/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Issue identified during product analysis.Medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.It was reported that this 980 ventilator failed the extended self test (est).The device was available for evaluation.He service personnel (sp) inspected the ventilator and confirmed the reported issue and replaced inspiratory flow module printed circuit board assembly (ifm pcba).The ventilator passed all calibrations and tests per manufacturer specifications at the time of service.One ifm pcba was returned for failure investigation.A visual inspection was carried out on the returned ifm pcba and no anomalies were observed.The part was attached to the test ventilator and powered up but failed the extended self test (est) circuit pressure test.After a thorough investigation, a faulty autozero solenoid (so1) on the ifm pcba was identified.Analysis also determined the ifm pcba was prior to the implementation of a change to address autozero solenoid (so1) failures.Investigation determined if so1 were to fail while in use on a patient, the ventilator response would be to enter backup ventilation (buv).The cause of the reported event was isolated to a faulty autozero solenoid (so1) on the ifm pcba.There is an existing previous internal investigation regarding this issue.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this 980 ventilators failed the extended self test (est).There was no patient involvement.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
980 VENTILATOR
Common Device Name
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
micheal collins rd mervue
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
micheal collins rd mervue
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key21230907
Report Number8020893-2025-00011
Device Sequence Number15339578
Product Code CBK
UDI-Device Identifier10884521171633
UDI-Public10884521171633
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySP
PMA/510(K) Number
K193056
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/24/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number980X1ESDIEC
Device Catalogue Number980X1ESDIEC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/12/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/14/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/24/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-