|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one crosser device was returned for evaluation.The 14s crosser cto recanalization catheter was returned loaded onto an unknown brand guidewire.A dry saline residue was noted at the distal end of the catheter shaft.Partial material separation was noted at the distal end of the catheter.The sample guide-wire lumen was flushed successfully.A measurement of the returned guidewire was taken and noted, the patency of the unknown guide-wire lumen was used and able to be inserted without any resistance and also retracted without issue.An in-house pin gauge was inserted into the distal tip of the catheter and no issues were noted.No other further testing was performed.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported device-device incompatibility through the evaluation of the unknown guide wire, as the sample guide-wire lumen was flushed successfully.A measurement of the returned guidewire was taken and noted, the patency of the unknown guide-wire lumen was used and able to be inserted without any resistance and also retracted without issue.An in-house pin gauge was inserted into the distal tip of the catheter and no issues were noted.However, the investigation is confirmed for the identified material separation as the partial separation was noted at the distal end of the catheter.A definitive root cause for the reported guidewire incompatibility and identified separation could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|