|
EXACTECH, INC. CC TIBIAL INSERT SZ 5, 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
CC TIBIAL INSERT SZ 5, 9MM |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Pain (1994); Osteolysis (2377)
|
| Date of Event |
09/22/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product associated with the reported event is within the scope of recall z-0019-2022; however, there is insufficient information to evaluate whether the subject issue of the recall was a cause or contributor to the reported event.The device was not returned for evaluation and no medical or other records containing treatment information or patient information have been received; therefore, the reported event cannot be confirmed, nor can the circumstances or potential causes or contributors to the alleged event be evaluated.Should additional, material information become available that permits more analysis or conclusions, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.D10 concomitants: (b)(6), 208-01-05 - cc femoral sz 5.(b)(6), 204-38-12 - stem extension w/slot 120l x18 mm.(b)(6), 208-09-05 - cc stem ext adaptor 5 degree.(b)(6), 02-010-03-0350 - logic cr femoral cem, right, sz 5.(b)(6), 02-012-45-5040 - lgc tibial fit tray cem sz 5f / 4t.(b)(6), 02-012-49-5009 - logic cr tib insert slope++, sz 5, 9mm.(b)(6), 200-02-38 - three peg patella 38mm.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received from legal on 06dec2023.He had the right knee rev 1 on (b)(6) 2015 by (b)(6).Had a 2nd right knee revision on (b)(6) 2022 by (b)(6).Original description summary: legal case ¿ usa.(b)(6) rk rev 2.Related (b)(4) rk rev 1.2 nov 2023, (b)(6), rn- additional information received from legal on 13 sep 2023.Revision op report and device information.This information does not affect the reportability assessments/severity.Revision operative report of 22 sept 2022-the patient was revised to competitor¿s devices.Procedure: revision right total knee arthroplasty.Intraoperative findings: loose femoral implants - removed easily with severe bone loss.Very extensive bone loss on the distal femur because of osteolysis.Soft tissue sent to pathology.During the extraction of the femoral implant the lateral condyle fracture 100% - this was reduced and fixed with screws x 2, and a distal femoral cone to anchor the lateral condyle as well-packed with bone graft mixed autograft and allograft.The patella was exposed, and the patellar button was well fixed and stable, it was retained.Sterile dressing applied.Patient reversed from anesthesia and sent to pacu in stable condition.Original description summary: (mdl no.3044) as reported via legal documentation the patient had a right knee revision on (b)(6) 2015.Approximately 6 years and 11 months after the first revision the patient had a second right knee revision on (b)(6) 2022.There is no other patient demographic or medical history available.There is no information on the surgical procedure or patient outcome.There is no device return.There are no photos or other images of the device provided.No additional information is available.¿plaintiffs allege that their knee or hip replacement devices failed prematurely because of degradation of the device¿s polyethylene component, which resulted in the premature removal (or planned removal) of the prosthesis at issue.¿ as directed by qa management: this legal complaint for polyethylene issues occurred in the us.The event did not occur in, nor is it reportable for australia, brazil, canada, eea/eu, japan, taiwan, or great britain, excluding northern ireland.Therefore, only the us reportability determination will be assessed.No ebi found.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported via legal documentation the patient had a right knee revision.Approximately 6 years and 11 months after the first revision the patient had a second right knee revision.There is no other patient demographic or medical history available.There is no information on the surgical procedure or patient outcome.There is no device return.There are no photos or other images of the device provided.No additional information is available.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|