• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SIG30AVM
Medical Device Problem Codes Misfire (2532); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 10/17/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D10 concomitant products: egiauxl - egiauxl endogia ultra univ xl stapler, lot# p3l0697.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during a roux-en-y procedure, the surgeon was able to press the green button but could not squeeze the handle.The device did not fire.To resolve the issue, a new handle was used with the same reload.It was noted that the procedure time was extended for ten minutes.There was no patient injury.Pli-20: medtronic's initial evaluation of the incident found that the reload was partially fired with the interlock engaged.The jaws were open.Staple pushers were visible at the 2.2cm cut line.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.No information regarding the specific customer issue that occurred with the device was available.Upon examination of the sample, it was found that the device partially fired.Visually, the reload was partially fired with the interlock engaged.The jaws were open and the staple pushers were visible at the 2.2cm cut line.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The partial fire condition with interlock engagement may occur when the firing handle has not been completely cycled.If the instrument return knobs are retracted at any point once the firing cycle has begun, the reload will engage into safety interlock and prevent further attempts to fire by ceasing the placement of staples and tissue transection and prevent patient harm.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: failure to completely fire the reload will result in an incomplete cut and/or incomplete staple formation, which may result in poor hemostasis and/or leakage.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during a roux-en-y procedure, the surgeon was able to press the green button but could not squeeze the handle.The device did not fire.To resolve the issue, a new handle was used with the same reload.It was noted that the procedure time was extended for 10 minutes.There was no patient injury.Medtronic's initial evaluation of the incident found that the reload was partially fired with the interlock engaged.The jaws were open.Staple pushers were visible at the 2.2cm cut line.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-STAPLE 2.0
Common Device Name
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key21254474
Report Number1219930-2025-00511
Device Sequence Number18436533
Product Code GDW
UDI-Device Identifier10884521543669
UDI-Public10884521543669
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
K160176
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/03/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberSIG30AVM
Device Catalogue NumberSIG30AVM
Device Lot NumberN4G2154Y
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/13/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/22/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/28/2025
02/03/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/28/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/29/2025
02/03/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/30/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-