| Catalog Number |
LXMC13 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815); Heartburn/Indigestion (1883); Pain (1994); Abdominal Distention (2601); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent 1/29/2025 d4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.D4: udi: the expiration date is currently not available.Therefore, the full udi is currently not available.B3: only event year known: 2024 an analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.However, if the product is received at a later date, the investigation will be updated as applicable.No lot or batch number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what was the date of implant? what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: productcompliant1@its.Jnj.Com what is the device lot number? was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? did the patient receive any dilations while the linx was implanted? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? when and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that there was broken linx reported.Only information given was that the linx device broke at post op.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/4/2025.Corrected data: d1, d4.Additional information received: (b)(4) will be patient (b)(4).Date of surgery (b)(6)2017 ¿ size 13.Patient #2 presented with excruciating pain during a 1.5t mri which is when the linx was suspected to have broken.The current surgeon did not place these devices.The surgeon who placed them are now at a different facility.Photo images were received.Any additional information obtained from the photo evaluation will be included as part of the product investigation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4) date sent: 2/10/2025.Photo analysis: a photo of a linx device visible disconnected, can be observed.An x-ray image of the device in vivo was reviewed by a medical safety officer.Per the mso's review, the device is discontinuous.The mechanism/cause of failure is unknown as a hands-on analysis of the device is necessary to determine the cause of failure.No further investigation can be completed at this point.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/18/2025 additional information received: the entire account has placed 22 linx devices.4 discontinuous devices.All patients had mri¿s.They were all 1.5t.One patient had multiple mri¿s.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/24/2025.Additional photo summary: an x-ray image of the device in vivo was reviewed by a medical safety officer.Per the mso's review, discontinuous device, but this has been removed but i can¿t say of it was discontinuous before or after.The mechanism/cause of failure is unknown as a hands-on analysis of the device is necessary to determine the cause of failure.No further investigation can be completed at this point.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|