|
Updated: b4, d4, g3, g6, h2, h3, h4, h6, h11.Distribution history: the complaint product was manufactured by csi on 10/22/2024.Manufacturing record review: dhr-619049893 was reviewed and no non-conformities, related to the complaint condition, were noted.Historical complaint review: a review of the 2-year complaint history showed no similar reported complaint conditions where the staplers erupted after surgery.However, there have been cases were wound separation is reported.Product receipt: the complaint product was not available at the time of this investigation.Visual evaluation: evaluation of the complaint product could not be completed as the complaint product has not been returned to coopersurgical.If the product should be returned at a later date, it will be evaluated, and any findings will be appended to this investigation.Functional evaluation: evaluation of the complaint product could not be completed as the complaint product has not been returned to coopersurgical.If the product should be returned at a later date, it will be evaluated, and any findings will be appended to this investigation.Root cause: no definitive root cause for this issue could be reliably determined.The ifu makes reference to the normal absorption time of the stapler as 10-12 weeks for one-half of its original mass, it also mentions the necessity of deep supporting sutures to ensure closure integrity and recommendations to minimize superficial or external staple placements.Coopersurgical will continue to monitor this complaint condition for trends.No further corrective action is necessary, as the complaint condition was not confirmed.
|