|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that during surgery, the trial tibial insert broke when it was being removed.A quick solution was found using another trial tibial insert that was inside the tibial tray in the equipment.Procedure was finished successfully, without affecting the patient and without alterations in the surgical times.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information received, "during surgery, when the trial tibial insert was being removed, it broke.A quick solution was found using another trial tibial insert that was inside the tibial tray in the equipment, thus avoiding discomfort for the specialist, managing to finish the surgery successfully, without affecting the patient and without alterations in the surgical times.At the end of the aforementioned reference, it is marked with red tape and left inside the equipment for easy identification and exchange when the devices return to j&j.A report of this development is also left in the case report, in the one force and in this medium in order to report what happened.(photographic records are attached)." the product was not returned to medtech orthopaedics; however photos were provided for review.See attachment ¿source file - reporte de calidad clinica el carmen -barranquilla colectivo 527172 of 912841¿.The photo investigation revealed that '254500505, attune fb ps artic surf sz5 was broken.The failure mode is consistent with inserting an extractor device in between the trial and mating shim, and using the extractor to pry the mating devices apart during extraction of the trials.This improper technique results in damage to the spring and/or post components of the articulating surface as well as the mating shim.The attune intuition surgical technique 0612-10-512 (page 53), emphasizes the correct use of the tibial trial extractor (product code 254500138) with the trials.Furthermore, on page 51 of the surgical technique and per ifu-0902-00-836, careful inspection of the trials for damage/breakage should be performed pre and post-operative.If any damage to the balseal components is observed the trail should be replaced.In the event of instrument breakage during use, ensure that all device fragments that may have entered the surgical site are removed prior to completion of the procedure, as patient injury may result.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the attune fb ps artic surf sz5 would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, unintended use error caused or contributed to event and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.Added: g1 (manufacturing site name).
|