• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MAKO ROBOTIC ARM 3.1; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MAKO ROBOTIC ARM 3.1; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 219999
Medical Device Problem Codes Application Program Problem: Parameter Calculation Error (1449); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/17/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted if additional information becomes available.
 
Event or Problem Description
The carving phase was uneventful, but when the version and inclination values set for the cup were activated when the arm was activated, the cup was pushed towards the superior.There were also difficulties in excision at this stage.)the cup was driven with the robot, but the surgeon also performed manual driving afterwards.After this stage, surgeon said that the version was wrong on the s copy image he looked at.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding inaccurate resection involving a mako robotic arm was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: the field service engineer reported: problem reproduced: no.Troubleshooting notes: none.Work performed: the surgeon and mps reported that the cup version value was different from what was seen on the screen.When i went to field for inspection.I realized that auto arm accuracy check was yellow i make it green by performing auto kincall.Additionally, no problems were observed.Work order disposition: system investigation completed successfully as per service manual.All system checks and tests passed, system is ready for use.Clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.Product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been other complaints with similar event(s) for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the alleged failure mode was confirmed to be potentially caused by accuracy out of spec as per the field service engineer visit.Based on the information reviewed there is no indication of any inherent software issue.
 
Event or Problem Description
The carving phase was uneventful, but when the version and inclination values set for the cup were activated when the arm was activated, the cup was pushed towards the superior.There were also difficulties in excision at this stage.)the cup was driven with the robot, but the surgeon also performed manual driving afterwards.After this stage, surgeon said that the version was wrong on the s copy image he looked at.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAKO ROBOTIC ARM 3.1
Common Device Name
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
3365 enterprise ave
weston FL 33331
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
3365 enterprise ave
weston FL 33331
Manufacturer Contact
alessandra chavez
3365 enterprise ave
weston, FL 33331
9546280700
MDR Report Key21274950
Report Number3005985723-2025-00046
Device Sequence Number12285748
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier07613327395280
UDI-Public07613327395280
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryTU
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/21/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number219999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/08/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/27/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/30/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/21/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/29/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-