|
The reported event could be confirmed, since the device ct scan shows the described cyst formation at the tibia.There is also a very large cyst at the anterior aspect of the talar component.Loosening of both the tibia and the talus is possible.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.The device history record could not be reviewed because the affected device was not returned, and the lot number was not communicated.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Upon further investigation of the ct scans, healthcare professionals opined that- the ct scan shows the described cyst formation at the tibia.There is also a very large cyst at the anterior aspect of the talar component.Loosening of both the tibia and the talus is possible, though.There is no clear migration.The underlying cause for the loosening is unclear.A patient related factor due to poor bone substance is likely.However, failure of total ankle replacement tar over time is a known complication.In case of a planned revision procedure a medical opinion aiming to determine the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient radiological and clinical information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.In cases where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided, because key clinical information e.G.Clinical status, exact symptoms and range of motion of the patient, assessment of the treating physician is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be determined scientifically without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable in such cases to provide statements about the patient, the procedure and or the device in relation to cause of the failure.Based on investigation the issue is caused most likely due to patient related factor i.E.Poor bone substance but more detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
|