|
The device was not returned.Three retained samples from the same lot were used to perform a knot pull tensile test.The retained samples used for the knot pull tensile test met requirements.Production records were reviewed.There were no nonconformities noted with the lot during production.All finished goods testing requirements were met prior to release.There was no evidence that the device failed to meet specifications, and the report could not be substantiated.A cause for the event cannot be established.This report and use of categorical definitions required by fda 3500a does not constitute an admission by riverpoint medical or its employees that riverpoint medical or its employees have caused or contributed to the event described in this report.Riverpoint medical has filed this information to comply with the medical device reporting regulation 21 cfr 803.If additional information is provided to riverpoint medical regarding this event, a supplementary 3500a form will be submitted as required by the fda.
|
|
According to the reporter, "according to the reporter, six days postoperatively, the patient returned urgently with complete release of the overlock on the two eyes, and it was noted that the suture line did not hold.Attempted repair under local anesthesia proved unsuccessful.The patient had to be taken back under anesthesia generally the following night to redo the two conjunctival sutures with another thread of slower resorption.In addition, the patient extended hospitalization and was admitted to the icu.".
|