• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Disturbances (2140)
Date of Event 01/01/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a3b, a4 and a5: unknown/ asked but not available.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Section e1:surgeon's email address and phone number: unknown/ asked but not available.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that patient complaint of being visually disabled and negative dysphotopsia.The patient had attempted to adjust at surgeon recommendation for more than 6 months but was unable to.The preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from patient's left eye in a secondary procedure and replaced with a non jnj lens.It was stated that the product was handled correctly according to the directions for use, and there were no complications such as unplanned incisions or vitrectomy during the procedure.Dysphotopsia was resolved immediately after explanting the lens.Patient feels better with replaced lens.There was no use error.No other information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 2/3/2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was cut into three pieces and coated in viscoelastic residue.The pieces were cleaned and presented with no additional issues.No further evaluation was performed.Conclusion: no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues reported were identified during product evaluation.The lens cut observed during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21279911
Report Number3012236936-2025-000018
Device Sequence Number12739892
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731813
UDI-Public(01)05050474731813(17)260803
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/07/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/03/2026
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/07/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/18/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/30/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/07/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/03/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-