|
|
| Catalog Number |
222205 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/22/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: investigation summary a photo was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.The j&j medtech orthopaedics team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photo.Visual inspection of the photo reveled that the anchor is broken into two pieces.Only a partial part of the shaft is also shown, which does not have structural anomalies.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the 4.5 healix peek anch.W/ocord would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the root cause is traced to procedural variables, such handling of the devices or product interaction during procedure; axial misalignment occurred and consequently the anchor fracture.Therefore the anchor could not be completely inserted.As per instructions for use (ifu), improper instrument use, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion may result in anchor fracture.Incomplete insertion or poor bone quality may result in anchor pullout.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is required.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a rotator cuff repair surgical procedure it was observed that the 4.5 healix peek anch.W/ocord anchor was broken off.It was reported that all the broken pieces were removed from the patient.It was further observe that the anchor pulled out.Another device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No additional information could be provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: investigation summary: the product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device found that the anchor is broken.The broken parts are still attached to the inserter.Anchor threads are stripped.No other anomalies were noted.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the 4.5 healix peek anch.W/ocord would have contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; axial misalignment occurred and consequently the anchor fracture.Therefore, the anchor could not be completely inserted.As per instructions for use (ifu), improper instrument use, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion may result in anchor fracture.Incomplete insertion or poor bone quality may result in anchor pullout.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|