• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/08/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3a, a3b, a4, a5 and a6: unknown, information was requested but not available.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable as the device remains implanted.Section h3(no): the intraocular lens (iol) is not returning for evaluation as the lens remains implanted; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, the information was not available.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that sticking haptics encountered during surgical procedure which the surgeon had to use two different instruments and then go in with irrigation/aspiration (ia) again to free the haptics.Through follow ups, it was learned that the lens remains implanted and no issues with the patient outcome reported.The surgery just took longer to separate the sticking haptics.No other surgical or medical interventions required.No patient injury reported.Balanced salt solution (bss) was used for preparation of the device.No further information was provided.The sticking haptics issue happened in two cases.This emdr report pertains to the first event with the lens dib00, sn (b)(6).The second event does not meet the reportability criteria.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: historical data analysis: a search of complaints related to the production order was performed and few additional complaints were found.These complaint issues reported are not related; therefore, no further actions are required.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21290890
Report Number3012236936-2025-000029
Device Sequence Number13144055
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731776
UDI-Public(01)05050474731776(17)270828
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateHI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/26/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/08/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/05/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/03/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/26/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-