| Model Number |
1203375-38 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/19/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.The additional device referenced in b5 is filed under a separate medwatch report number.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the posterior tibial with moderate calcification and no tortuosity.The 3.75x38mm esprit btk system was prepared according to the instruction for use (ifu); however, when removing the sheath there was resistance.When an attempt was made to advance the system over the command guide wire there was resistance and the esprit became stuck.The esprit was never inserted into the patient anatomy; however the guide wire had to be removed from the patient with the esprit on the proximal end of the wire.A non-abbott guide wire and a new esprit were used to complete the procedure successfully.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the posterior tibial with moderate calcification and no tortuosity.The 3.75x38mm esprit btk system was prepared according to the instruction for use (ifu); however, when removing the sheath there was resistance.When an attempt was made to advance the system over the command guide wire there was resistance and the esprit became stuck.The esprit was never inserted into the patient anatomy; however the guide wire had to be removed from the patient with the esprit on the proximal end of the wire.A non-abbott guide wire and a new esprit were used to complete the procedure successfully.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported difficulty to remove the protective sheath could not be confirmed as it was related to operational context of the procedure.The reported difficulty to advance and difficulty to remove (guide wire) were confirmed as the device was returned with the procedural guide wire frozen inside of it.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.Based on the reported information and the observations from the returned analysis, a definitive cause for the reported issues could not be determined.Based on the results of the complaint investigation there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the posterior tibial with moderate calcification and no tortuosity.The 3.75x38mm esprit btk system was prepared according to the instruction for use (ifu); however, when removing the sheath there was resistance.When an attempt was made to advance the system over the command guide wire there was resistance and the esprit became stuck.The esprit was never inserted into the patient anatomy; however the guide wire had to be removed from the patient with the esprit on the proximal end of the wire.A non-abbott guide wire and a new esprit were used to complete the procedure successfully.There was no adverse patient effect and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported difficulty to remove the protective sheath could not be confirmed as it was related to operational context of the procedure.The reported difficulty to advance and difficulty to remove (guide wire) were confirmed as the device was returned with the procedural guide wire frozen inside of it.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.Factors that could contribute to difficulty removing the protective sheath include, but are not limited to, damage during manufacturing, inadvertent mishandling during removal from packaging/preparation of the device.In this case, the inner diameter of the sheath was measured and was with specification.Additionally, difficult to advance/remove (guide wire resistance) may be attributed to several factors including, but not limited to, inner diameter of guide wire lumen, outer diameter of the guide wire, condition of the guide wire, damage to the catheter or accumulation of blood or contrast.It should be noted that the guide wire portion that was not frozen with the device was measured and met product specification standards.No other damage to the guide wire that could contribute to the reported difficulties was noted.In this case, it is possible a buildup of procedural contaminants may have contributed to the reported difficulty to advance/remove over the guide wire; however, this cannot be confirmed.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|