| Catalog Number |
RED72KIT |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fracture (1260); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
01/05/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the right m1 middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a non-penumbra base catheter, and a guidewire via the right radial artery.It was noted that the patient had a tortuous anatomy.During the procedure, the red72 was advanced through the non-penumbra catheter but the physician encountered resistance in the internal carotid artery (ica).Therefore, the physician decided to remove both catheters.A guidewire was inserted for removal support.The red72 fractured at the distal length and the proximal length of the red72 was removed from the patient.The distal portion of the red72 remained in the patient.Multiple snare devices were used to try and retrieve the fractured piece of the red72; however, it was unsuccessful.The patient was transported to another facility for an open carotid endarterectomy where the fractured piece of the red72 was removed.Subsequently, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (icu).It was reported that the patient was recovering.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the right m1 middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72) a non-penumbra base catheter, and a guidewire via the right radial artery.It was noted that the patient had a tortuous anatomy.During the procedure, the red72 was advanced through the non-penumbra catheter but the physician encountered resistance in the internal carotid artery (ica).Therefore, the physician decided to remove both catheters.A guidewire was inserted for removal support.The red72 fractured and the distal portion of the red72 remained in the patient.Multiple snare devices were used to try and retrieve the fractured piece of the red72; however, it was unsuccessful.The patient was transported to another facility for an open carotid endarterectomy where the fractured piece of the red72 was removed.Subsequently, the patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (icu).On 13-feb-2025, additional information was received that the patient is recovering in a skilled nursing facility and able to perform basic functions.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Please note that the following section was updated: 1.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem.Evaluation of the returned penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72) confirmed a fracture on the distal shaft.Further evaluation revealed stretching near the fracture.Kinks and ovalizations were present along the length of the catheter.If the red72 is advanced against resistance, damage such as kinks and ovalizations may occur.Subsequently, if the device is retracted against resistance, damage such as a fracture may occur.Based on the reported complaint, the root cause of resistance during the procedure could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed additional kinks and ovalizations on the proximal segment, and the coil winds were snared within a non-penumbra catheter.This damage was likely incidental and occurred during removal.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|