|
The reference (b)(4) has been allocated to this case by rayner.The event description provided states that the leaidng haptic separated from the optic during iol implantation.The iol was explanted and exchanged during the original surgery session without further incident and without harm or injury to the patient."iol replacement or extraction" is listed in the "adverse events" section of the rayone ifu.The device has not been returned.The rayone preloaded iol injection system use risk analysis identifies the following as possible causes of "trapped/ torn lens haptic/ optic during insertion"; inadequate amount of viscoelastic; inadequate quality of viscoelastic; haptic trapped by plunger override due to fast motion; user opens closed flaps and closes again before use; plunger advanced too quickly, insertion of viscoelastic through nozzle leading to inadequate amount of viscoelastic; user removed injector from tray prior to inserting viscoelastic, causing lens to be improperly placed in cartridge; user removed injector from tray prior to closing cartridge, resulting in cartridge not being clipped properly; optic edge trapped/ damaged on closure of cartridge, sharp edge instruments and dehydration of the lens prior to implantation.Our review of production records for the rayone aspheric rao600c batch 113228989 showed that all manufacturing and quality checks were conducted with successful results.All devices released for distribution from this batch were within tolerance, met specification criteria and were without defects.A review of vigilance data confirms this is an isolated event.No other incidents, of any type, have been received against the rayone aspheric rao600c batch 113228989.There is insufficient evidence and information available to determine the cause of haptic breakage during iol implantation.
|