• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC FEMORAL PS CEM LEFT SZ 4; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC FEMORAL PS CEM LEFT SZ 4; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 02-010-01-0240
Medical Device Problem Code Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Osteolysis (2377); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Date of Event 01/16/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D10: concomitants: (b)(6) 02-012-45-4030 - lgc tibial fit tray cem sz 4f / 3t, (b)(6) 204-34-02 - fluted stem extension 25l x 14 mm, (b)(6) 204-70-00 - tibial stem ext.Screw.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a 62 yo male patient, initial left knee implanted in (b)(6) 2013, underwent a revision procedure in (b)(6) 2025, approximately 11 years 1 month post the initial procedure.The surgeon revised the patient¿s logic femoral component, tibial insert and patella due to osteolysis.There was significant polyethylene wear on the tibial insert and patella.There was no cement adhered to the logic femoral component once it was removed.Cement was only present on the femur.The surgeon left the logic tibial components in place as they were well fixed.He revised the femur to logic cc components and replaced the patella with an active e truliant 3 peg patella.There were no device breakages or surgical delays during the procedure.The patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.No x-rays were able to be obtained.The explanted devices are not available for return as the facility held the product.No device images were provided.No further information.This is report 3 of 3 for this event/patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The revision reported is likely the result of a combination of osteolysis, prosthesis wear of the tibial insert and patella, and femoral loosening over 11 years of implantation.The loosening may have led to an increase in cement and bone particles in the joint space and resulted in prosthesis wear or prosthesis wear may have contributed to particle-induced osteolysis and subsequent loosening.However, the reported failures cannot be confirmed, contributions of loosening and prosthesis wear to the sequence of events, and potential user or patient-related considerations could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and no images or radiographs were provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LOGIC FEMORAL PS CEM LEFT SZ 4
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville, FL 32653
MDR Report Key21315904
Report Number1038671-2025-00683
Device Sequence Number20942010
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10885862001160
UDI-Public10885862001160
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K033883
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2013
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/09/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/09/2018
Device Catalogue Number02-010-01-0240
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/16/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/08/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/05/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/09/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/14/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H11.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight63 KG
-
-