• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH ACCOLADE 132 SIZE 3.5; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH ACCOLADE 132 SIZE 3.5; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6020-3535
Medical Device Problem Codes Degraded (1153); Fracture (1260); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 01/14/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.An evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was not returned to the manufacturer.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
The following was reported: "the patient bent over and it cracked in his left hip.You can see the broken cone." update: proposed revision date is set for (b)(6) 2025.Update: the customer told me that the neck is not broken.The metal shows a high degree of abrasion.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding fracture involving a accolade stem was reported.The event was confirmed via medical review.Method & results -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.-medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "conclusion/assessment: there is no patient history, medical records or sequential x-rays provided for review.Revision data was not provided for review.The pi report notes a crack occurring in the "cone" of the hip stem when the patient bent over.The primary operative report shows placement of a tmzf stem with a lfit v40 metal head.Unlabeled/undated x-rays show disarticulation of the femoral head from the stem and likely fracture/severe trunnion wear.A revision surgery is not documented but alluded to and would be expected.Event confirmation: disarticulation of an lfit v40 metal femoral head from a tmzf stem can be confirmed.Fracture of the stem and/or severe trunnion wear is noted.Revision cannot be confirmed but would be expected.Root cause: the root cause of the proposed revision would be disarticulation of the lfit v40 metal femoral head from the tmzf stem.The root cause of the disarticulation of the head would be either fracture/severe trunnion wear.The root cause for the fracture/severe trunnionosis cannot be stated." -product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to trunnion wear/fracture.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "conclusion/assessment: there is no patient history, medical records or sequential x-rays provided for review.Revision data was not provided for review.The pi report notes a crack occurring in the "cone" of the hip stem when the patient bent over.The primary operative report shows placement of a tmzf stem with a lfit v40 metal head.Unlabeled/undated x-rays show disarticulation of the femoral head from the stem and likely fracture/severe trunnion wear.A revision surgery is not documented but alluded to and would be expected.Event confirmation: disarticulation of an lfit v40 metal femoral head from a tmzf stem can be confirmed.Fracture of the stem and/or severe trunnion wear is noted.Revision cannot be confirmed but would be expected.Root cause: the root cause of the proposed revision would be disarticulation of the lfit v40 metal femoral head from the tmzf stem.The root cause of the disarticulation of the head would be either fracture/severe trunnion wear.The root cause for the fracture/severe trunnionosis cannot be stated." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event or Problem Description
The following was reported: "the patient bent over and it cracked in his left hip.You can see the broken cone." update: proposed revision date is set for (b)(6)2025.Update: the customer told me that the neck is not broken.The metal shows a high degree of abrasion.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding wear and disassociation involving a accolade stem was reported.The event was confirmed via medical review.Method & results: product evaluation and results: visual inspection & material analysis: damage consistent with the loss of taper lock was observed on the head and stem of the returned devices.The trunnion of the stem is severely worn.Medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "conclusion/assessment: there is no patient history, medical records or sequential x-rays provided for review.Revision data was not provided for review.The pi report notes a crack occurring in the "cone" of the hip stem when the patient bent over.The primary operative report shows placement of a tmzf stem with a lfit v40 metal head.Unlabeled/undated x-rays show disarticulation of the femoral head from the stem and likely fracture/severe trunnion wear.A revision surgery is not documented but alluded to and would be expected.Event confirmation: disarticulation of an lfit v40 metal femoral head from a tmzf stem can be confirmed.Fracture of the stem and/or severe trunnion wear is noted.Revision cannot be confirmed but would be expected.Root cause: the root cause of the proposed revision would be disarticulation of the lfit v40 metal femoral head from the tmzf stem.The root cause of the disarticulation of the head would be either fracture/severe trunnion wear.The root cause for the fracture/severe trunnionosis cannot be stated." product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to trunnion wear/fracture.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "conclusion/assessment: there is no patient history, medical records or sequential x-rays provided for review.Revision data was not provided for review.The pi report notes a crack occurring in the "cone" of the hip stem when the patient bent over.The primary operative report shows placement of a tmzf stem with a lfit v40 metal head.Unlabeled/undated x-rays show disarticulation of the femoral head from the stem and likely fracture/severe trunnion wear.A revision surgery is not documented but alluded to and would be expected.Event confirmation: disarticulation of an lfit v40 metal femoral head from a tmzf stem can be confirmed.Fracture of the stem and/or severe trunnion wear is noted.Revision cannot be confirmed but would be expected.Root cause: the root cause of the proposed revision would be disarticulation of the lfit v40 metal femoral head from the tmzf stem.The root cause of the disarticulation of the head would be either fracture/severe trunnion wear.The root cause for the fracture/severe trunnionosis cannot be stated." visual inspection & material analysis: damage consistent with the loss of taper lock was observed on the head and stem of the returned devices.The trunnion of the stem is severely worn.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event or Problem Description
No new information.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACCOLADE 132 SIZE 3.5
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
anna ryan
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
61498200
MDR Report Key21343414
Report Number0002249697-2025-00185
Device Sequence Number9116365
Product Code LPH
UDI-Device Identifier04546540510624
UDI-Public04546540510624
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K121308
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2012
Device Explanted Year2025
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/04/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2016
Device Catalogue Number6020-3535
Device Lot Number36274506
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/14/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/10/2025
07/08/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/10/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/06/2025
08/04/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/20/2011
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-