• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/16/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4, a5 and a6: unknown, information was requested but not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Device evaluation: the product testing could not be performed as the product was not returned for evaluation.The reported complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no other complaints were received for this po.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, the information has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that after implanting a monofocal intraocular lens (iol) into a patient's left eye, the doctor observed a crack at the haptic optic junction.The lens was subsequently explanted and replaced with another lens of the same model and diopter.There was no patient injury reported.No further information was provided.The doctor indicated that this was not the first time that this issue has occurred to him.This report pertains to the issue reported with the dib00 lens, sn (b)(6).A separate report is being submitted for the earlier incident which the doctor experienced.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on jun 13, 2025.Section h3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product.The plunger rod was found fully advanced with viscoelastic residue observed to be evenly distributed throughout the cartridge.Stress marks were observed on the cartridge tip but were in speciation for a used device.The lens module and device assembly were inspected revealing no issues.The plunger rod and plunger rod advancement were inspected revealing no issues.The lens was inspected revealing it was received cut in half and stuck together.The lens was unstuck and cleaned revealing two chipped-like marks near the edge of one lens half.No further evaluation was performed.The complaint issue "lens damaged" was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.No nonconformity report, documentation or labeling changes, and escalations are required.Johnson & johnson surgical vision will continue to monitor these types of complaints.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21352205
Report Number3012236936-2025-000038
Device Sequence Number18101860
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731714
UDI-Public(01)05050474731714(17)270702
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0180
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/16/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/06/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/11/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/16/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/02/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-