• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER LEGION ANTERIOR VITRECTOMY HANDPIECE; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER LEGION ANTERIOR VITRECTOMY HANDPIECE; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8065753050
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Cut (2587)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/20/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
 
Event or Problem Description
A physician reported that during surgery, an ophthalmic anterior vitrectomy handpiece was not working properly.Procedure details and patient impact have not been provided.Additional information has been requested, none received till date.This is the first of two reports received from the same initial reporter.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was provided in sections b.3, b.5, h.6 and h.11.The product under investigation is not a serviceable device.Therefore, a service record review was not performed.There was no product returned for testing on this investigation.The customer reported event cannot be confirmed.Based on the information obtained, the root cause of the reported event is inconclusive.A non-conformance based review of the serial number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.A manufacturing device history record (dhr) review was performed prior to product release to ensure that the product was manufactured in compliance with the device master record.Based on the assessment, the product met release criteria.A review for complaints reported against this serial number was performed.No similar complaints were reported for the product serial under investigation.Based on the information obtained, the root cause of the reported event is inconclusive.Manufacturer will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received indicates the issue occurred during cataract surgery.The surgery was completed by another system.There was no patient impact.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product under investigation is not a serviceable device.Therefore, a service record review was not performed.However, the vitrectomy cutter was returned for testing on this investigation.A non-conformance based review of the serial number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.A manufacturing device history record (dhr) review was performed prior to product release to ensure that the product was manufactured in compliance with the device master record.Based on the assessment, the product met release criteria.A review for complaints reported against this serial number was performed.All relevant complaints found were reviewed as part of this investigation.The vitrectomy cutter was received for testing.A visual assessment of the returned sample revealed no obvious nonconformity.The handpiece was connected to a calibrated breakout test box, where the resistance was found to be within specification.The returned sample was connected to a calibrated system.The handpiece was recognized successfully and passed the pre-surgery vit test.However, the probe was not cutting during the probe performance test.Disassembling the handpiece revealed the coil caused the handpiece to get hot.The root cause of the reported event is attributed to the nonconforming coil.However, how or when the coil became nonconforming remains inconclusive.Manufacturer will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEGION ANTERIOR VITRECTOMY HANDPIECE
Common Device Name
UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
15800 alton parkway
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
15800 alton parkway
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key21354745
Report Number2028159-2025-00198
Device Sequence Number7959111
Product Code HQC
UDI-Device Identifier00380657530502
UDI-Public(01)00380657530502(17)330124(11)230127(10)15A8AC
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIN
PMA/510(K) Number
K191650
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/13/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8065753050
Device Lot Number15A8AC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/24/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/12/2025
05/08/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/11/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/18/2025
05/13/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/27/2023
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-