|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC SOLO2, 3CG; PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER (PICC)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/22/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Each event reported to bd is evaluated and investigated in accordance with our complaint investigation procedures.The investigation process includes, but is not limited to, evaluation of the event details provided by the complaint facility, a review of complaint history, manufacturing records and risk document where applicable, and an evaluation of the subject device when available to identify potential contributing factors.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported, three piccs with three different patients were found to have split/holes after being removed from patients.This report addresses all three devices.No other information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The complaint of a leak was confirmed.The products returned for evaluation were three 4fr single lumen powerpicc solo catheters.The investigation findings are consistent with damage accumulated through flexural fatigue.Flexural fatigue may occur due to cyclic kinking of the catheter tube in which physiological, placement, usage, and mechanical factors may gradually form a crack(s) in the catheter.The returned product samples were evaluated, and a split was observed in two of the units.In unit 01 a split was present between the 9 cm and 10 cm depth markers.In unit 03 a split was present between the 3 cm and 4 cm depth markers.Unit 02 had two kinks present, between the 9 cm and a 10 cm depth markers and at the 13 cm depth marker.However, no leaks were observed when the unit was leak tested.The catheter splits observed in units 01 and 03 contained physical features associated with material fatigue, and the characteristics observed which supported this type of failure included: damage which was circumferentially aligned.Fracture edges which were rounded and polished due to repeated material wear.'c' shaped impressions leading into the fracture site which are consistent with material buckling due to movement which caused the fracture edges to be pressed together, overall elliptical shape to the fracture cross-section (a result of repeated kinking of the tubing).Repetitive kinking of the indwelling catheter appears to have contributed to the observed leak; however, the specific circumstances surrounding how kinking developed into a fracture within the catheter tubing were ultimately unknown.This complaint will be recorded for future trending and monitoring purposes.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|