• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3507175BC
Medical Device Problem Code Material Rupture (1546)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
Date of Event 06/03/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
A female patient who underwent unspecified breast surgery with mentor memorygel, 175cc silicone prosthesis experienced bilateral silent ruptures discovered through ultrasound imaging.As a result, the patient underwent bilateral removal on (b)(6) 2024.During a reinvestigation into the case, it was identified that the two devices in question were mismatched products and belong to this file.Relevant device information and product investigation details have been transferred from (b)(4) (blind unit) to this complaint.Notably, the patient indicated that the implants were implanted in 1989, suggesting they may not have been manufactured by leiden, with the correct product codes for both implants being 3507175bc, rather than 350-7175bc.Further investigation and clarification regarding the product codes and manufacturing origins will be necessary.His report relates to the right side.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: silent rupture.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.D4: udi: as the serial number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
On february 18, 2025 mentor became aware that this report needs to be revised because it incorrectly describes the device in question as a blind device; in fact, it is directly related to this complaint.Additionally, on february 18, 2025 mentor became aware that it erroneously submitted the initial report with the incorrect value in g3.The correct value is july 16, 2024.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation completed on february 13, 2025: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the gel mod-rnd 175cc breast implant was found to be ruptured.Because of the now settled u.S.Class action that applied, in part, to implants manufactured in texas, usa that were implanted on or before may 31, 1993, to avoid any potential allegation of spoliation of evidence, mentor is prohibited from conducting a further physical evaluation of this covered device.Mentor performs 100% inspection of all devices prior to release, product evaluation concluded that the tear occurred sometime subsequent to the removal of the device from its protective packaging.Mentor also performed a manufacturing record evaluation related to the reported complaint for the finished device lot number.No manufacturing non-conformances were identified as part of this evaluation.Although no conclusion could be reach on the cause of the reported event, the instructions for use contain the following caution: rupture can occur at any time after implantation but is more likely to occur the longer the implant is implanted.The following may cause implant to rupture: stressing the implant during implantation and weakening it; folding or wrinkling of the implant shell; excessive force to the chest (e.G.During closed capsulotomy); trauma; compression during mammographic imaging; and severe capsular contracture.Breast implants may also simply wear out over time.As part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria: no corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MENTOR MEMORYGEL BREAST IMPLANT
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
Manufacturer (Section D)
MENTOR TEXAS
3041 skyway circle north
irving TX 75038
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENTOR TEXAS
3041 skyway circle north
irving TX 75038
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
3041 skyway circle north
irving, TX 75038
3035526892
MDR Report Key21376654
Report Number1645337-2025-01503
Device Sequence Number15609327
Product Code FTR
UDI-Device Identifier00081317000044
UDI-Public00081317000044
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySP
PMA/510(K) Number
P030053
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year1989
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number3507175BC
Device Lot Number29314
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/10/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/12/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/16/2024
02/13/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/13/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/18/2025
02/24/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/01/1988
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-