• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT, HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT, HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 2700
Medical Device Problem Code Device Stenosis (4066)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Dyspnea (1816)
Date of Event 01/23/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient with a 23mm 2700 aortic valve, underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after implant duration of nine (9) years, seven (7) months due to aortic stenosis.The patient presented with shortness of breath.The tavr was successfully performed with 23mm 9750tfx valve without complications and patient left the or with stable vitals.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: this device remains implanted in the patient as this is a valve-in-valve procedure.This device is not expected for return.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: d4 (expiration date), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6 (type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions).Stenosis is a common manifestation of bioprosthetic valve and valved conduit dysfunction and has many potential root causes, including structural valve deterioration (svd), non-structural valve dysfunction (nsvd), endocarditis and/or thrombosis.Bioprosthetic device stenosis is typically related to patient and/or procedural factors and is not typically an indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency.Device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed, and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.There is no evidence to suggest a manufacturing defect caused or contributed to the reported event.The most likely root cause is patient-related factors, including coronary artery disease (cad), history of coronary artery bypass graft (cabg), and chronic kidney disease (ckd).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT, HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key21378877
Report Number2015691-2025-01022
Device Sequence Number3849198
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103021608
UDI-Public(01)00690103021608(17)190408
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/28/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/08/2019
Device Model Number2700
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/23/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/27/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/13/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/28/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/09/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-