• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number APB-3-8-3D-ES
Medical Device Problem Codes Stretched (1601); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/26/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis #(b)(4):equipment used: video inspection system (m-85519), ruler (m-83360), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5 as found condition: the axium prime device was returned for analysis within a shipping box; within a sealed plastic biohazard pouch; within a dispenser coil and partially within an introducer sheath.The unknown micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis.Visual inspection/damage location details: no damages or irregularities were found with the introducer sheath and axium prime pusher.The axium prime implant coil was found stretched and damaged within the introducer sheath (figure c) as well as outside the introducer sheath (figure d).The implant coil tip was found still attached to the implant, indicative the coil did not break (figure e).Testing/analysis: the axium prime coil could not be retracted back within the introducer sheath as it was found stuck.The axium prime coil could not be used for resistance testing due to the damaged condition.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck in catheter¿ was confirmed as the damages found is consistent with resistance.Possible causes for coil resistance in catheter are, but not limited to, lack of hydration before procedure, user does not maintain continuous flush, damaged micro catheter, incompatible micro catheter, or tortuous anatomy.Customer reported vessel tortuosity as minimal, continuous flush was administered, and no damages were found with the micro catheter.Therefore, the likely cause could not be determined.The returned axium prime implant coil was confirmed to have ¿coil stretch¿.The customer reported the coil came out of the introducer sheath smoothly during preparation and did not report any damages found to the coil during preparation, therefore, it is likely the damage occurred due to advancing against the reported resistance.As the unknown micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis, any contribution of the micro catheter towards the resistance could not be determined.As the model and lot numbers were not reported, compatibility could not be assessed.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a procedure to treat a ruptured saccular aneurysm in the right internal carotid artery ophthalmic artery, there were issues with the axium prime bare 3d coil.The coil encountered significant resistance while being pushed through the microcatheter and became stuck in the middle of the catheter.Upon withdrawal, it was observed that the coil had stretched.The aneurysm had a maximum diameter of 6 millimeters and a neck diameter of 3 millimeters, with normal blood flow and minimal vessel tortuosity.Continuous flush was administered during the procedure.The coil was not repositioned, and the catheter was not damaged.The coil was damaged at the implant coil location.The product was never implanted and was replaced by another medtronic product.Additional information received reported that the cause of the resistance/stretch was not determined.The coil came out of the intro ducer sheath smoothly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635265677
MDR Report Key21395430
Report Number9617601-2025-00179
Device Sequence Number12893254
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00763000313746
UDI-Public00763000313746
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K151447
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/17/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberAPB-3-8-3D-ES
Device Catalogue NumberAPB-3-8-3D-ES
Device Lot Number227969703
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/02/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/11/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/18/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/22/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-