• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH SYNCHRONY; COCHLEAR IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH SYNCHRONY; COCHLEAR IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1250 SYNCHRONY 2
Medical Device Problem Code Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Skin Tears (2516)
Date of Event 02/03/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been explanted and should be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user's mother reported that her child's implant was coming out of her head.At implantation 2 channels were left extra-cochlear.The user has been explanted on (b)(6) 2025.It has been decided to wait for the skin to heal before proceeding with reimplantation.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user's mother reported that her child's implant was coming out of her head.The child had been holding her head for the past few days, but the mother did not notice the implant protruding until the night of (b)(6) 2025.The user has been explanted on (b)(6) 2025.It has been decided to wait for the skin to heal before proceeding with reimplantation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: device investigation did not reveal any device defect or damage, which is expected to have been present whilst implanted.Mechanical damages found during investigation are attributable to the removal surgery.According to the information received from the field the device was explanted due to an extrusion of the device through the skin.Review of the device_s sterilization records show that the device has been subject to a valid sterilization process, thus no available information points to the implant being the source of the reported issue.However, the presence of the device might have contributed to its subsequent development.Furthermore, two channels were left extra-cochlea at the time of implantation.This is a final report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNCHRONY
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key21396030
Report Number9710014-2025-00158
Device Sequence Number12658866
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737366827
UDI-Public(01)09008737366827
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P000025
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/25/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date04/21/2023
Device Model NumberMI1250 SYNCHRONY 2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/04/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/04/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/18/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/28/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age5 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-