|
Upon withdrawal of a.035x150cm, 3mm emerald guidewire the hard texture of the wire was seen protruding from the edge of the exposed diagnostic guidewire, which did not exclude damage to the vessel wall during the withdrawal process.There was no reported patient injury.The diagnostic guidewire was fed into the guideline through the y-valve until it was exposed, and then withdrawn as a whole.The hospital reported this case as a serious injury adverse event to (b)(6) directly.
|
|
As reported, upon withdrawal of a.035x150cm, 3mm emerald guidewire the hard texture of the wire was seen protruding from the edge of the exposed diagnostic guidewire, which did not exclude damage to the vessel wall during the withdrawal process.There was no reported patient injury.The diagnostic guidewire was fed into the guideline through the y-valve until it was exposed and then withdrawn as a whole.The hospital reported this case as a serious injury adverse event to china nmpa directly.Multiple attempts to gather additional information have been made and have been unsuccessful.A non-sterile guidewire, catalog number dgw.035 fc j3mm 150cm tef, was received for analysis.Upon visual inspection, a single kink was observed approximately 5 cm from the distal tip.At the location of the kink, the core wire was found to be fractured, with two separated ends protruding through the surrounding coil wire.Despite the internal separation, the guidewire was received intact, with the fractured core segment still attached to the distal tip.No portion of the core wire appeared to be missing.Microscopic examination of the fracture surfaces using a vision system revealed ductile dimples consistent with microvoid coalescence, a characteristic feature of ductile overload failure.This fracture mechanism occurs when the material is subjected to excessive mechanical stress, causing the formation, growth, and eventual coalescence of microvoids, which results in fracture.The presence of cuplike depressions on the fracture surface further supports this interpretation.In addition, plastic deformation was observed along the edges of the fracture, indicating that the applied stress exceeded the yield strength of the material, leading to permanent deformation and confirming the presence of mechanical overload.A review of the device history records for the specimen device does not present any indication of manufacturing defect or anomaly that could have impacted on the event as reported.The reported event of ¿coating-delaminated¿ was not confirmed; however, the event ¿guidewire-fractured¿ was verified through product analysis.Although the device was received in one piece, an internal fracture of the core wire was evident, with the separated section remaining attached to the distal end.The observed damage is consistent with exposure to excessive tensile forces.The exact source of this force could not be conclusively determined; however, interaction between the guidewire and a y-connector is one potential contributing factor.Users are trained to inspect devices for signs of damage both prior to and during use, and damaged products are not to be used.Safety information is provided in the product labeling to make users aware of the associated risks.According to the instructions for use (ifu), although not intended as a risk mitigation measure, it is advised that ¿if strong resistance is met during manipulation, discontinue the procedure and determine the cause of resistance before proceeding.If the cause of the resistance cannot be determined, withdraw the catheter and guidewire.¿ based on the available evidence, there is no indication that the observed event is related to device design or manufacturing.Therefore, no corrective or preventive actions are warranted at this time.
|