|
The manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice/recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging an issue related to a dreamstation cpap pro device's sound abatement foam.The patient has alleged visualization of particles.There was no report of harm or injury.No medical intervention was required by the patient.The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the manufacturer's investigation is complete.
|
|
The manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice/recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging an issue related to a dreamstation cpap pro device's sound abatement foam.The patient has alleged visualization of particles.There was no report of harm or injury.No medical intervention was required by the patient.The device was returned to the third-party service center for further evaluation.During the evaluation of the device at the third-party service center, the device was visually inspected and found no evidence of foam degradation.The device powered on and airflow was confirmed.The device's downloaded logs were reviewed by the third-party service center.The third-party service center concludes that they couldn't confirm the customer's allegation and there was no visible foam degradation and unit scrapped.The manufacturer is submitting a final report at this time.If pertinent information becomes available to the manufacturer at a later date, an addendum to this final report will be filed.Box h: evaluation method code, evaluation results code, component code grid and conclusion code grid has been updated.
|