| Model Number |
G31919 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Premature Activation (1484)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1 - country: japan e1 - postal code: (b)(6).Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.A definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined.A possible contributing factor to premature band deployment includes allowing the trigger cord to become lodged between the barrel and the distal end of the endoscope.This can restrict trigger cord movement and result in premature band deployment if enough tension is applied to pull the cord free.Premature band deployment can also occur if the handle is placed in the firing position before the endoscope is in place inside the patient or even while winding the trigger cord.The user is advised not to apply tension to the trigger cord while winding it on the handle to avoid premature deployment of bands.The instructions for use caution the user: ¿with handle in two-way position, slowly rotate handle clockwise to wind trigger cord onto handle spool until it is taut.Note: care must be taken to avoid deploying a band while winding trigger cord." prior to distribution, all 10 shooter saeed multi-band ligators are subjected to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: based on the quality engineering risk assessment no corrective action is warranted at this time.A review of the complaint history was conducted.Based on this review, the likelihood of this type of report is rare.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During an endoscopic variceal ligation, the physician used a cook 10 shooter saeed multi-band ligator.It was reported that two bands were fired at the same site at same time.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During an endoscopic variceal ligation, the physician used a cook 10 shooter saeed multi-band ligator.It was reported that two bands were fired at the same site at same time.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1 - postal code: (b)(6).E1 - phone number: (b)(6).Investigation evaluation: the product said to be involved was returned in a clear plastic bag with an open box and tray from the lot number provided in the report.The label matches the product returned.The loading catheter and 6 bands did not return.Our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved confirmed the report based on the condition of the returned device.The device was returned with no bands remaining on the barrel and the trigger cord wrapped around the handle in a post deployment state.Four loose, constricted bands returned with the device.A visual examination of the device was performed.The trigger cord was examined and all twenty deployment beads were present.The beads were verified for correct location.The beads were examined using magnification and found to be correctly filled and had no evidence of excess flash.The trigger cord was intact and not broken.The length of the trigger cord was measured between the knots and was within the tolerance.An evaluation of the handle wheel movement was performed and the wheel functioned as intended.A product-specific discrepancy that could have caused or contributed to this observation was not observed during our laboratory analysis.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: our evaluation of the returned device confirmed the report.A definitive cause for this observation could not be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.Due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy, endoscope position or progression of disease state, we could not reproduce the actual conditions of product usage during our laboratory analysis.This limits our ability to conclusively determine a cause.A possible contributing factor to premature band deployment includes allowing the trigger cord to become lodged between the barrel and the distal end of the endoscope.This can restrict trigger cord movement and result in premature band deployment if enough tension is applied to pull the cord free.Premature band deployment can also occur if the handle is placed in the firing position before the endoscope is in place inside the patient or even while winding the trigger cord.The user is advised not to apply tension to the trigger cord while winding it on the handle to avoid premature deployment of bands.The instructions for use caution the user: ¿with handle in two-way position, slowly rotate handle clockwise to wind trigger cord onto handle spool until it is taut.Note: care must be taken to avoid deploying a band while winding trigger cord." prior to distribution, all 10 shooter saeed multi-band ligators are subjected to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: based on the quality engineering risk assessment no corrective action is warranted at this time.A review of the complaint history was conducted.Based on this review, the likelihood of this type of report is rare.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|