|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
3505430BC |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Rupture (1546); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Capsular Contracture (1761); Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360); Breast Discomfort/Pain (4504)
|
| Date of Event |
01/13/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At the time of this report, mentor has received no information regarding explantation or an expected explantation date.It is unknown at this time if the device will be made available for return.As a result, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: n/a.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent primary breast augmentation with two 430cc mentor memorygel breast implants.Post-operatively, the patient was diagnosed, via mri, with bilateral breast implant ruptures.In addition, the patient is also believed to be experiencing bilateral breast capsular contractures (baker grade unspecified).At the time of this report, mentor has received no information regarding explantation or an expected explantation date.This medwatch form is for the left breast prosthesis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On february 17, 2025, mentor became aware that the following were erronously omitted from the initial report.The patient only experienced baker grade i capsular contracture on the left and baker grade ii on the right breast.The patient was also diagnosed with bilateral implant malposition, bilateral animation deformity, bilateral breast pain, right breast swelling and seroma.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On november 5, 2025, mentor received additional information that indicated that the patient has been scheduled for breast implant removal surgery on (b)(6) 2025.Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: material rupture, malposition, animation deformity, breast pain.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On january 26, 2026, mentor received additional information that indicated that the patient's explantation surgery has been rescheduled for (b)(6) 2026.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On february 17, 2026, mentor received additional information that indicated that the patient's implants were replaced bilaterally with two mentor gel implants.On march 5, 2026, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On march 30, 2026, the product investigation was completed.Device investigation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection, microscopic examination, and shell thickness of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned device revealed that the breast implant was found to be ruptured from both aspects.Additionally, it was received in two segments.Microscopic examination was performed, and the cause of the tear could not be identified.Therefore, a thickness measurement was conducted on the shell at the tear, and the thickness was within manufacturing specifications.Mentor also performed a manufacturing record evaluation related to the reported complaint for the finished device lot number.No manufacturing non-conformances were identified as part of this evaluation.Although no conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event, the instructions for use contain the following caution: rupture can occur at any time after implantation but is more likely to occur the longer the implant is implanted.The following may cause implant to rupture: stressing the implant during implantation and weakening it; folding or wrinkling of the implant shell; excessive force to the chest (e.G.During closed capsulotomy); trauma; compression during mammographic imaging; and severe capsular contracture.Breast implants may also simply wear out over time.Implant displacement/migration may occur from improper implant sizing and/or placement, i.E., when the implant is too large or the pocket too small or when there has been inadequate preoperative assessment of stresses causing movement of the prosthesis.Implant displacement/migration is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our current product insert data sheet.Most women undergoing augmentation or reconstruction with a mammary prosthesis will experience some pain postoperatively.While pain normally subsides in most women as they heal from surgery, it can become a chronic problem in other women.Chronic pain can be associated with a variety of factors.Pain is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our current product insert data sheet.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria: no corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|