| Catalog Number |
SRX-285 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Capsular Contracture (1761)
|
| Date of Event |
12/30/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported a right side capsular contracture baker grade iii/iv.Device has been explanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformances noted.The event of capsular contracture is a physiological complication and analysis of the device generally does not assist allergan in determining a probable cause for this event.Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: capsular contracture baker grade iii/iv.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation: based on the product analysis performed, the assessments of the complaint codes are: ¿ capsular contracture: unable to observe.A workmanship was observed not related to the complaint for a split and patch event.A further investigation is requested.As per the investigation procedure, deformation was observed and none of the observations are found to be potentially related to the manufacturing process, no further actions are required.Additional, corrected and/or changed data: d.9, h.3, h.6.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported a right side capsular contracture baker grade iii/iv.Device has been explanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Fi summary: the review of the documentation associated to the manufacturing process indicates that all devices involved in this work order were released in accordance with abbvie¿s procedures and were no defects/problems/issues found in the documents or in the personnel training related to the reported event.Additionally, no er/ ncr(s) were identified during the investigation associated with this lot and the complaint.According to the device analysis performed in the laboratory was observed a workmanship (split in patch) not related to the complaint.The event of capsular contracture was unable to observed and the workmanship has not relation to reported complaint.Therefore, the reported event was not confirmed.A review of the current risk documents pfmea-silicone filled bi and sizer assy (v8.0) was performed, and the event of split in patch is a known event, for which current process controls and inspections are established to reduce the incidence of this defect.Considering that there is not an adverse trend for this type of event only (b)(4) in (b)(6) 2023 no additional actions are deemed required at this time.The issues with split in patch event will continue to be monitored and corrective action taken in the future if deemed appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported a right-side capsular contracture baker grade iii/iv.Device has been explanted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|