|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
CP00003 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Puncture/Hole (1504)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
10/03/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records was performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that sometime post port placement procedure, the patient complained of tingling at port site.Redness and mild swelling were noted.It was further reported that there was a perforation in the proximal aspect of the catheter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that sometime post a port placement, the patient complained of tingling at port site.Redness and mild swelling were noted.It was further reported that there was a perforation in the proximal aspect of the catheter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported catheter perforation issue as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.The definitive root cause for the catheter perforation issue could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|