• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH SYNCHRONY; COCHLEAR IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH SYNCHRONY; COCHLEAR IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1250 SYNCHRONY 2
Medical Device Problem Code Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Date of Event 05/14/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the user has no hearing response on three channels during single channel stimulation.Currently, 10 channels are usable for stimulation; however, channels 7-9 also seem unusable due to no response regardless of the stimulation.Implant check was conducted on (b)(6) 2024.During the appointment 6 channels were deactivated due to insufficient benefit from these, which resulted in lightly better sound quality.A ct scan was planned.The user has been re-implanted on (b)(6) 2025 due to a complete electrode migration out of the cochlea.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been explanted and has been returned to med-el hq where it will be evaluated.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow-up report.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the user has no hearing response on three channels during single channel stimulation.Currently, 10 channels are usable for stimulation; however, channels 7-9 also seem unusable due to no response regardless of the stimulation.Implant check was conducted on (b)(6) 2024.During the appointment 6 channels were deactivated due to insufficient benefit from these, which resulted in lightly better sound quality.A ct scan was planned.The user has been re-implanted on (b)(6) 2025 due to a complete electrode migration out of the cochlea.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: according to the information received from the field the device was not providing benefit due to a migration of the electrode out of cochlea.Further, during device investigation damage to the active electrode due to device minute mobility causing fatigue wire breakages was found.Other mechanical damages are related to the removal surgery.This is a final report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNCHRONY
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key21430700
Report Number9710014-2025-00178
Device Sequence Number17314465
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737395353
UDI-Public(01)09008737395353
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
P000025
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/12/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date04/25/2026
Device Model NumberMI1250 SYNCHRONY 2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/18/2025
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/18/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/18/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/21/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/12/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/25/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age83 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-