|
On (b)(6)2013 an onxace-19 sn (b)(6) was used in a case for a 41-year-old female patient.This valve was reported as explanted and replaced on (b)(6) 2024 (4,186 days post implant) by onxae-23 sn (b)(6).Per the pa-c the valve was explanted and replaced due to circumferential pannus formation below the valve that caused impaired leaflet mobility.The valve was not kept and there will be no further information or medical records provided.During the investigation, it was discovered that the patient had passed on (b)(6)2025 due to vf arrest with a concern for a stemi.The surgeon reported that he considered the death to be unrelated to the valve, as such the investigation is limited to the report of pannus.The valve was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation, however all available records relevant to the case were reviewed and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.Pannus formation resulted in explant 11 years and 5 months postop.The instructions for use (ifu) identify explantation as a risk factor due to adverse events including pannus.The frequency of occurrence for pannus is not established and has been reported for the on-x valve only anecdotally (see, for example, han 2015 for an aortic case and abad 2016 for a tricuspid case).However, bonnichsen et al.Reiterate the claim by vitale et al.That thrombosis and pannus are both present in as many as 45% of cases of obstructed mechanical valves (on-x was not evaluated in this particular study) [bonnichsen 2015, vitale 1997].The risk management and usability engineering file for the on-x heart valve was reviewed and found to be adequate.The reported event will continue to be monitored for trends.No updates to the rmf are needed in response to this complaint.Risk has been reduced as low as possible and overall residual risk is acceptable.References: abad c, et al.Dysfunction of an on-x heart valve by pannus, j heart valve dis 2016 sep;25(5):634-637.Bonnichsen cr & pellikka pa, prosthetic valve thrombus versus pannus ¿ progress with imaging, circ cardiovasc imaging 2015;8: doi: 10.1161/circimaging.115.004283.Han k, et al.Subprosthetic pannus after aortic valve replacement surgery: cardiac ct findings and clinical features, radiology 2015;v276n3:724-731.On-x instructions for use including aortic valve inr 1.5-2.0 update.Http://www.Onxlti.Com/ifu.Vitale n, et al.Obstruction of mechanical mitral prostheses: analysis of pathologic findings, ann thorac surg 1997;63:1101-1106.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to artivion- formerly cryolife/jotec is accurate or has been confirmed by artivion.
|